Tag Archives: tolerance

Happy Meals and so-called “gay marriage”

Happy MealI suppose it shouldn’t be surprising that San Francisco would decide that it can tell McDonald’s they are no longer allowed to sell a safe, legal product. If you have not heard about this, San Francisco, a city dominated by very vocal and powerful homosexuals, has passed a law that says McDonald’s can no longer put toys in Happy Meals unless the meals meet certain guidelines, mainly being under a certain amount of calories. Trying to keep little kids from becoming fat is a good thing, but I don’t see how Happy Meals are the main cause of obesity as opposed to lack of exercise and parents who let kids go overboard. I ate plenty of Happy Meals, I still like them sometimes, and I have never been overweight. Millions of other people are the same. But San Francisco’s “progressive” idea that they (homosexuals) know what is best for everyone and their hatred for big companies makes this type of insanely ridiculous law OK by them. Of course McDonald’s should do the right thing and ignore the law and sue all the way to the Supreme Court when it is enforced, but the fear of bad public relations will stop that.

Let’s not forget that San Francisco is the same place that has, as an official act of the city, condemned the Catholic Church in clear violation of the First Amendment and they have been upheld by a federal court in doing so. When I am asked the same question, over and over, by so-called “gay marriage” advocates why I oppose redefining marriage, I say again and again that I don’t trust homosexual activists to not attempt to force the Church to marry gay people (they already have talked openly of doing so and groups like “rainbow sash” have proven that homosexual rights advocates are openly hateful of the Church and want to see it brought down). I also don’t trust our courts or legislatures to protect the Church. Given the homosexual proclivity to use the power of the state to enforce their own brand of “morality” on everyone else, does it seem unreasonable for me to be concerned? You not being concerned is unreasonable.


Before you call yourself tolerant

I am open-minded, progressive, and so very tolerant. How dare offense be levied at homosexuals, people of a different race or nationality, or the disabled. We, after all, must be tolerant of others no matter what. My tolerance is inextricably tied to my intellect.

Are not the masses brainwashed by their fairy tales? Studies have shown that those of us who are open-minded, progressive, and tolerant are far smarter than the masses. It is our keen intellect and ability to reason that made us ever so tolerant.

You idiots and your faith. Oh wait, unless you are Buddihst, Muslim, Pagan, Jewish, or one of the other faiths practiced by other people, somewhere else, whose views do not encroach upon my politics. It is you other idiots and your faith whom I truly hate. Your beliefs are worthy of my scorn and your leaders deserve no respect. Because I am intelligent and I know far better than you. My ability to reason has shown this to be true.

And I am tolerant.

Original post: http://scrambledmegsntoast.xanga.com/719399046/before-you-call-yourself-tolerant/